<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 758 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427813</link>
    <description>Deemed export benefits and Terminal Excise Duty refund under the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-14 depend on contemporaneous endorsement of the supplier as a subcontractor in contract documents issued by the project authority. Inclusion in a vendors list, or a later clarification letter equating &quot;vendor&quot; with &quot;subcontractor,&quot; is insufficient where the policy requires prior contractual endorsement. A certificate issued only by the main contractor also does not satisfy Clause 8.6.2. Separately, supplies under an International Competitive Bidding contract for a project financed by a notified foreign agency fall within the policy exemption under Clause 8.3(c), so refund of duty paid is not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:57:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 758 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427813</link>
      <description>Deemed export benefits and Terminal Excise Duty refund under the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-14 depend on contemporaneous endorsement of the supplier as a subcontractor in contract documents issued by the project authority. Inclusion in a vendors list, or a later clarification letter equating &quot;vendor&quot; with &quot;subcontractor,&quot; is insufficient where the policy requires prior contractual endorsement. A certificate issued only by the main contractor also does not satisfy Clause 8.6.2. Separately, supplies under an International Competitive Bidding contract for a project financed by a notified foreign agency fall within the policy exemption under Clause 8.3(c), so refund of duty paid is not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>