<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 15 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30441</link>
    <description>SC upheld tribunal&#039;s decision regarding tax deduction claim. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed after finding the assessee&#039;s excess deduction was an unintentional error based on professional advice. The court concluded no penalty was warranted under Section 271(1)(c) since all material facts were disclosed and the mistake was made in good faith.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 09:24:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 15 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30441</link>
      <description>SC upheld tribunal&#039;s decision regarding tax deduction claim. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed after finding the assessee&#039;s excess deduction was an unintentional error based on professional advice. The court concluded no penalty was warranted under Section 271(1)(c) since all material facts were disclosed and the mistake was made in good faith.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>