<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2129 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304277</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order to delete the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized the importance of establishing the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions, highlighting the need for proper verification rather than relying solely on external information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:56:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2129 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304277</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order to delete the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized the importance of establishing the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions, highlighting the need for proper verification rather than relying solely on external information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>