https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304275 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that denying the refund of input credit for goods supplied to SEZ at nil rate of duty would increase costs and lead to the export of taxes, against international trade practices. The decision highlighted the importance of Rule 6(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, in such cases. The appeal was allowed, and the authority was directed to grant the refund in accordance with the law, including any limitations. en-us Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:56:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304275 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that denying the refund of input credit for goods supplied to SEZ at nil rate of duty would increase costs and lead to the export of taxes, against international trade practices. The decision highlighted the importance of Rule 6(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, in such cases. The appeal was allowed, and the authority was directed to grant the refund in accordance with the law, including any limitations. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304275