<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 725 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427780</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the reopening of assessment for Assessment Year 2017-18 under the Income Tax Act. The petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding insufficient reasons, procedural irregularities, and lack of foul play in previous assessments were considered. The Court emphasized the need for prima facie material to reopen a case based on suspicious transactions during demonetization. It highlighted the importance of fair consideration of the petitioner&#039;s reply and natural justice principles. The Assessing Officer was directed to independently decide the matter, keeping the parties&#039; rights and contentions open for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 725 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427780</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the reopening of assessment for Assessment Year 2017-18 under the Income Tax Act. The petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding insufficient reasons, procedural irregularities, and lack of foul play in previous assessments were considered. The Court emphasized the need for prima facie material to reopen a case based on suspicious transactions during demonetization. It highlighted the importance of fair consideration of the petitioner&#039;s reply and natural justice principles. The Assessing Officer was directed to independently decide the matter, keeping the parties&#039; rights and contentions open for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>