<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 692 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427747</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 41,21,700/- as deemed income under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. It found the reassessment proceedings faulty due to improper service of notice, emphasizing the importance of proper jurisdictional procedures and the revenue&#039;s duty to adequately consider and verify the evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 692 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427747</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 41,21,700/- as deemed income under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. It found the reassessment proceedings faulty due to improper service of notice, emphasizing the importance of proper jurisdictional procedures and the revenue&#039;s duty to adequately consider and verify the evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>