https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427746 The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, and the disallowance of Rs. 6,00,000/- out of traveling and conveyance expenses was upheld by the tribunal. The tribunal concurred with the CIT(A) that the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the claimed expenses, emphasizing the requirement for detailed documentation to support business expenses. The tribunal highlighted the taxpayer's responsibility to establish the business purpose of expenses, citing relevant judicial precedents. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:13:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427746 The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, and the disallowance of Rs. 6,00,000/- out of traveling and conveyance expenses was upheld by the tribunal. The tribunal concurred with the CIT(A) that the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the claimed expenses, emphasizing the requirement for detailed documentation to support business expenses. The tribunal highlighted the taxpayer's responsibility to establish the business purpose of expenses, citing relevant judicial precedents. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427746