https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427743 The court upheld SEBI's actions, ruling that SEBI was not obligated to provide all documents relied upon in the Show Cause Notice or the complete opinion under Rule 3 of the SEBI Adjudication Rules 1995. It found that SEBI had followed proper procedure and complied with the principles of natural justice. The court dismissed the writ petition, allowing SEBI to continue the inquiry without providing documents not shared with the petitioner. The Special Leave Petition was also dismissed, affirming SEBI's compliance with the law. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427743 The court upheld SEBI's actions, ruling that SEBI was not obligated to provide all documents relied upon in the Show Cause Notice or the complete opinion under Rule 3 of the SEBI Adjudication Rules 1995. It found that SEBI had followed proper procedure and complied with the principles of natural justice. The court dismissed the writ petition, allowing SEBI to continue the inquiry without providing documents not shared with the petitioner. The Special Leave Petition was also dismissed, affirming SEBI's compliance with the law. Case-Laws SEBI Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427743