https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427742 Applications under Section 76 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were rejected as having been filed near the completion of the insolvency proceedings and as tending to delay disposal of the main matter. The appellate tribunal found no basis to disturb that procedural assessment, noting that the adjudicating authority's view on timing and object of the interlocutory applications was entitled to due weight. The challenge therefore failed, and the order refusing interlocutory reliefs was left undisturbed. en-us Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:13:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427742 Applications under Section 76 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were rejected as having been filed near the completion of the insolvency proceedings and as tending to delay disposal of the main matter. The appellate tribunal found no basis to disturb that procedural assessment, noting that the adjudicating authority's view on timing and object of the interlocutory applications was entitled to due weight. The challenge therefore failed, and the order refusing interlocutory reliefs was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427742