<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 683 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427738</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the amount held in the &#039;no lien account&#039; belonged to the Corporate Debtor. The Bank&#039;s claim over the Rs.1 Crore amount, deposited for the OTS Proposal, was dismissed as the money was to be utilized only after plan approval. The Tribunal emphasized that the Bank had no right over the funds once the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process commenced, citing provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appeal was rejected, affirming that the money in question was the property of the Corporate Debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:13:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 683 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427738</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the amount held in the &#039;no lien account&#039; belonged to the Corporate Debtor. The Bank&#039;s claim over the Rs.1 Crore amount, deposited for the OTS Proposal, was dismissed as the money was to be utilized only after plan approval. The Tribunal emphasized that the Bank had no right over the funds once the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process commenced, citing provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appeal was rejected, affirming that the money in question was the property of the Corporate Debtor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>