<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 120 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30430</link>
    <description>Board circulars bind administrative authorities as a matter of administrative discipline, but an adjudication supported by a detailed inquiry into compliance with exemption notification conditions will not be disturbed in Revenue&#039;s appeal absent legal infirmity. Here, the adjudicating authority had examined the exporter&#039;s fulfilment of the notification requirements through the Development Commissioner&#039;s office and passed a detailed, speaking order dropping the demand proceedings. As the record disclosed no error in that decision and the relevant circular had been considered, the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the dropping of proceedings was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 120 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30430</link>
      <description>Board circulars bind administrative authorities as a matter of administrative discipline, but an adjudication supported by a detailed inquiry into compliance with exemption notification conditions will not be disturbed in Revenue&#039;s appeal absent legal infirmity. Here, the adjudicating authority had examined the exporter&#039;s fulfilment of the notification requirements through the Development Commissioner&#039;s office and passed a detailed, speaking order dropping the demand proceedings. As the record disclosed no error in that decision and the relevant circular had been considered, the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the dropping of proceedings was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>