<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 676 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427731</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the demand for payment of interest. The appellant&#039;s entitlement to a refund was finalized, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal held that the refund claims were not time-barred, emphasizing that the relevant date for filing was the date of the final judgment by the High Court. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting the appellant consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:12:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 676 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427731</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the demand for payment of interest. The appellant&#039;s entitlement to a refund was finalized, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal held that the refund claims were not time-barred, emphasizing that the relevant date for filing was the date of the final judgment by the High Court. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting the appellant consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>