<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 262 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30429</link>
    <description>The judgment set aside the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on the appellants, as there was no credible evidence of overvaluation or deliberate mis-declaration. The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, and the appeals of the other parties were allowed. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural fairness and the credibility of evidence in adjudicating such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 262 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30429</link>
      <description>The judgment set aside the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on the appellants, as there was no credible evidence of overvaluation or deliberate mis-declaration. The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, and the appeals of the other parties were allowed. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural fairness and the credibility of evidence in adjudicating such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>