<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1965 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304260</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance under Section 14-A due to the lack of nexus between expenses and exempt income. The increase in book profit under Section 115JB was deemed irrelevant following the deletion of the disallowance. The Tribunal directed the correct computation of interest under Section 234C, emphasizing the importance of establishing a nexus for disallowance under Section 14-A and clarifying the method of charging interest under Section 234C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 20:36:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1965 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304260</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance under Section 14-A due to the lack of nexus between expenses and exempt income. The increase in book profit under Section 115JB was deemed irrelevant following the deletion of the disallowance. The Tribunal directed the correct computation of interest under Section 234C, emphasizing the importance of establishing a nexus for disallowance under Section 14-A and clarifying the method of charging interest under Section 234C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>