<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1425 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304266</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the adjudication order due to incomplete supply of text. The petitioner was allowed to file an appeal manually within four weeks, relieving the respondent from the limitation issue, based on a Division Bench ruling allowing hardcopy appeals to be considered timely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1425 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304266</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the adjudication order due to incomplete supply of text. The petitioner was allowed to file an appeal manually within four weeks, relieving the respondent from the limitation issue, based on a Division Bench ruling allowing hardcopy appeals to be considered timely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>