https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30425 Preventive detention requires a proximate and live nexus between the alleged prejudicial activity and the detention order; unexplained delay in issuing the order can break that link and render detention unsustainable. The text also states that a detenu's representation must be examined promptly and independently before the case is referred to the Advisory Board, because Article 22(5) protects an effective right to representation. Sending the matter to the Board while the representation remains pending is treated as a mechanical approach that undermines the constitutional safeguard and vitiates the detention process. en-us Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30425 Preventive detention requires a proximate and live nexus between the alleged prejudicial activity and the detention order; unexplained delay in issuing the order can break that link and render detention unsustainable. The text also states that a detenu's representation must be examined promptly and independently before the case is referred to the Advisory Board, because Article 22(5) protects an effective right to representation. Sending the matter to the Board while the representation remains pending is treated as a mechanical approach that undermines the constitutional safeguard and vitiates the detention process. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30425