https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304251 The court examined whether endorsements on pronotes, acknowledging part payments made after the limitation period, could extend the limitation period under the Limitation Act. It discussed the distinction between acknowledgments and promises under the Contract Act, emphasizing the need for a promise to be in writing and signed. The court concluded that determining if the endorsements constituted a promise required a trial for a detailed examination of facts. It held that the question could only be resolved with evidence presented during the trial, rejecting the petition and emphasizing the importance of trial proceedings in ascertaining the true intent behind the endorsements. en-us Sat, 18 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:18:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304251 The court examined whether endorsements on pronotes, acknowledging part payments made after the limitation period, could extend the limitation period under the Limitation Act. It discussed the distinction between acknowledgments and promises under the Contract Act, emphasizing the need for a promise to be in writing and signed. The court concluded that determining if the endorsements constituted a promise required a trial for a detailed examination of facts. It held that the question could only be resolved with evidence presented during the trial, rejecting the petition and emphasizing the importance of trial proceedings in ascertaining the true intent behind the endorsements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 18 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304251