https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427720 Allegations of GST invoice fraud and wrongful input tax credit were treated as a serious economic offence involving use of fake invoices and fictitious firm details to claim input credit. The court held that custodial interrogation was necessary for effective investigation, so anticipatory bail was not justified on the facts. The plea of parity failed because the co-accused was said to have played a different and smaller role and had sought regular bail after custody, making the comparison inapposite. Anticipatory bail, as an exceptional relief, was therefore declined. en-us Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Apr 2025 13:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427720 Allegations of GST invoice fraud and wrongful input tax credit were treated as a serious economic offence involving use of fake invoices and fictitious firm details to claim input credit. The court held that custodial interrogation was necessary for effective investigation, so anticipatory bail was not justified on the facts. The plea of parity failed because the co-accused was said to have played a different and smaller role and had sought regular bail after custody, making the comparison inapposite. Anticipatory bail, as an exceptional relief, was therefore declined. Case-Laws GST Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427720