<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 663 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427718</link>
    <description>HC ruled on a GST detention case involving timber transport discrepancies. The court found the factual disputes unsuitable for writ jurisdiction and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies through appellate forums under Section 107. The goods were detained due to mismatches in E-way bill, invoice, and actual consignment, with the vehicle seized under Section 129 of WBGST Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 663 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427718</link>
      <description>HC ruled on a GST detention case involving timber transport discrepancies. The court found the factual disputes unsuitable for writ jurisdiction and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies through appellate forums under Section 107. The goods were detained due to mismatches in E-way bill, invoice, and actual consignment, with the vehicle seized under Section 129 of WBGST Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>