<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 653 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of excise duty refund and interest subsidy as &#039;capital receipts&#039;, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It also ruled in favor of the Assessee regarding the inclusion of these receipts in book profit under MAT provisions, allowing the Assessee&#039;s appeal and deleting the addition. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of legal precedents and the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:51:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 653 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of excise duty refund and interest subsidy as &#039;capital receipts&#039;, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It also ruled in favor of the Assessee regarding the inclusion of these receipts in book profit under MAT provisions, allowing the Assessee&#039;s appeal and deleting the addition. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of legal precedents and the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>