<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 650 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427705</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoned the delay in filing, and ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The original assessment order was restored, negating the PCIT&#039;s revisions. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on the 9th of September, 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 650 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427705</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoned the delay in filing, and ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The original assessment order was restored, negating the PCIT&#039;s revisions. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on the 9th of September, 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>