<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 644 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427699</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) and CESTAT, affirming the provisional nature of the price declared in the bill of entry and the right of the assessee to produce additional evidence. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, with costs not imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:50:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 644 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427699</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) and CESTAT, affirming the provisional nature of the price declared in the bill of entry and the right of the assessee to produce additional evidence. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, with costs not imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>