https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427691 Article 227 confers supervisory, not appellate, jurisdiction, so the High Court may interfere only to keep a tribunal within jurisdiction or to correct grave illegality, perversity, or manifest injustice. It cannot direct how the NCLT should decide pending objections on stamp law or the admissibility of documents, or reappreciate interim orders. As the insolvency dispute had not been finally determined and had been remitted for fresh consideration, the petition was premature and supervisory interference was declined, leaving the Stamp Act issues to be decided afresh on merits by the NCLT. en-us Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 13:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427691 Article 227 confers supervisory, not appellate, jurisdiction, so the High Court may interfere only to keep a tribunal within jurisdiction or to correct grave illegality, perversity, or manifest injustice. It cannot direct how the NCLT should decide pending objections on stamp law or the admissibility of documents, or reappreciate interim orders. As the insolvency dispute had not been finally determined and had been remitted for fresh consideration, the petition was premature and supervisory interference was declined, leaving the Stamp Act issues to be decided afresh on merits by the NCLT. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427691