<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 176 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30419</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the CA&#039;s certificate for non-levy of service tax on housekeeping services due to lack of specific details and supporting evidence. The appellant failed to provide substantial evidence to support their claim, leading to the burden of proof not being met. Despite acknowledging financial hardship, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a reduced sum to avoid appeal dismissal, with the balance of duty and penalty being waived upon compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 176 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30419</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the CA&#039;s certificate for non-levy of service tax on housekeeping services due to lack of specific details and supporting evidence. The appellant failed to provide substantial evidence to support their claim, leading to the burden of proof not being met. Despite acknowledging financial hardship, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a reduced sum to avoid appeal dismissal, with the balance of duty and penalty being waived upon compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>