<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 616 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427671</link>
    <description>The appeals against Wealth Tax assessment orders for AYs 2001-02 to 2007-08 were partly allowed by the Tribunal on August 5, 2022. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s determination of the assessee as the sole owner of the property at Natesan Nagar and the denial of deduction for debts owed due to lack of evidence. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the correct computation of interest by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:49:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 616 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427671</link>
      <description>The appeals against Wealth Tax assessment orders for AYs 2001-02 to 2007-08 were partly allowed by the Tribunal on August 5, 2022. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s determination of the assessee as the sole owner of the property at Natesan Nagar and the denial of deduction for debts owed due to lack of evidence. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the correct computation of interest by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>