https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304245 Minimum attendance under Ordinance 11 was held to be an independent and mandatory prerequisite for progression in the law course. Clause 9 required 75% aggregate attendance, allowed only limited condonation, and barred students below 70% from appearing in the semester-end examination; Clause 9.2 also provided that detention for shortage of attendance prevented promotion and required readmission and repetition of courses. The Court read Clause 11.3(v) harmoniously with these provisions and held that satisfaction of the 50% credit requirement could not override the attendance norm. It rejected reliance on ambiguity or contra proferentem and deferred to the academic standards fixed for professional legal education. en-us Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:48:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304245 Minimum attendance under Ordinance 11 was held to be an independent and mandatory prerequisite for progression in the law course. Clause 9 required 75% aggregate attendance, allowed only limited condonation, and barred students below 70% from appearing in the semester-end examination; Clause 9.2 also provided that detention for shortage of attendance prevented promotion and required readmission and repetition of courses. The Court read Clause 11.3(v) harmoniously with these provisions and held that satisfaction of the 50% credit requirement could not override the attendance norm. It rejected reliance on ambiguity or contra proferentem and deferred to the academic standards fixed for professional legal education. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304245