<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1304 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304248</link>
    <description>In insolvency liquidation proceedings, an inordinate delay in filing a claim cannot be condoned by invoking equity where the process is strictly time-bound; the 672-day delay was not condoned. A claim submitted in Form F, instead of the prescribed liquidation claim form, did not comply with the governing regulations and was treated as non est, so it could not be entertained as a valid stakeholder claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:48:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1304 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304248</link>
      <description>In insolvency liquidation proceedings, an inordinate delay in filing a claim cannot be condoned by invoking equity where the process is strictly time-bound; the 672-day delay was not condoned. A claim submitted in Form F, instead of the prescribed liquidation claim form, did not comply with the governing regulations and was treated as non est, so it could not be entertained as a valid stakeholder claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>