https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427663 The HC allowed the Writ Petitions, setting aside the impugned order rejecting the refund claim. The matter was remanded to the Assistant Commissioner [State Tax] to reconsider the refund applications filed in January 2020 for the excess balance in the Electronic Cash Ledger. The authority was directed to hear the petitioner and decide the matter afresh in accordance with law within six weeks. No costs were awarded. en-us Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Aug 2025 14:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427663 The HC allowed the Writ Petitions, setting aside the impugned order rejecting the refund claim. The matter was remanded to the Assistant Commissioner [State Tax] to reconsider the refund applications filed in January 2020 for the excess balance in the Electronic Cash Ledger. The authority was directed to hear the petitioner and decide the matter afresh in accordance with law within six weeks. No costs were awarded. Case-Laws GST Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427663