<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 595 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427650</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to pay a redemption fine and penalty of Rs.6,60,000 for re-exporting seized gold articles, specifically a chain with a pendant and a bangle weighing 600 grams. Despite a communication discrepancy, the court facilitated payment arrangements, setting a deadline for the petitioner to appear for payment. Upon compliance, the court ordered the closure of the proceedings, allowing for the re-export process to proceed smoothly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 595 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427650</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to pay a redemption fine and penalty of Rs.6,60,000 for re-exporting seized gold articles, specifically a chain with a pendant and a bangle weighing 600 grams. Despite a communication discrepancy, the court facilitated payment arrangements, setting a deadline for the petitioner to appear for payment. Upon compliance, the court ordered the closure of the proceedings, allowing for the re-export process to proceed smoothly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>