<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 580 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427635</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the decisions of the CIT(A) and AO regarding the disputed remuneration paid to a partner. The ITAT found that the remuneration payment to the partner was in accordance with the Income Tax Act provisions, specifically section 40(b), as outlined in the partnership deed. The ITAT criticized the lower authorities for their erroneous disallowance and concluded that the assessee&#039;s claim for remuneration payment was valid based on the partnership deed and relevant legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 580 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427635</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the decisions of the CIT(A) and AO regarding the disputed remuneration paid to a partner. The ITAT found that the remuneration payment to the partner was in accordance with the Income Tax Act provisions, specifically section 40(b), as outlined in the partnership deed. The ITAT criticized the lower authorities for their erroneous disallowance and concluded that the assessee&#039;s claim for remuneration payment was valid based on the partnership deed and relevant legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>