<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 575 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal held that penalties cannot be imposed on additions made on an estimation basis. The CIT(A) had already reduced the estimated disallowance, and the Tribunal followed the precedent to delete the penalty, providing relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 575 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal held that penalties cannot be imposed on additions made on an estimation basis. The CIT(A) had already reduced the estimated disallowance, and the Tribunal followed the precedent to delete the penalty, providing relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>