<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 571 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- made by the AO, as the assessee adequately proved the genuineness of the loan transactions. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of independent evidence from the Revenue to support the claim of accommodation entries. The appeals filed by the Revenue for both assessment years were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 20:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 571 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- made by the AO, as the assessee adequately proved the genuineness of the loan transactions. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of independent evidence from the Revenue to support the claim of accommodation entries. The appeals filed by the Revenue for both assessment years were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>