<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 568 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427623</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai dismissed the appeal without costs, upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision. The Tribunal found the delay in submitting the claim to be significant (672 days) and lacking bona fide, emphasizing adherence to the time-bound nature of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code process. Despite arguments regarding failure to invite Public Announcement of Liquidation Order, appreciation of statutory dues, consideration of additional properties, and requests for condonation, the Tribunal affirmed the original decision, underscoring compliance with procedural requirements and timelines under the IBC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 568 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427623</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai dismissed the appeal without costs, upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision. The Tribunal found the delay in submitting the claim to be significant (672 days) and lacking bona fide, emphasizing adherence to the time-bound nature of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code process. Despite arguments regarding failure to invite Public Announcement of Liquidation Order, appreciation of statutory dues, consideration of additional properties, and requests for condonation, the Tribunal affirmed the original decision, underscoring compliance with procedural requirements and timelines under the IBC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>