<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 247 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30407</link>
    <description>Transfers of Cenvat-creditable inputs to sister units may be discharged by reversing the credit originally taken where no independent sale price to unrelated buyers exists, rather than by adopting a higher transaction value. Bona fide doubt created by changing rules and Board clarifications, combined with revenue neutrality where duty paid by one unit is creditable to the other, does not establish wilful suppression or intent to evade duty; extended limitation, penalty and related interest therefore do not apply. Credit on supplementary invoices remains admissible where corresponding duty is creditable, and differential freight demands cannot survive on the same revenue-neutral basis. Trimming charges were treated as non-includible in value on the stated facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 247 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30407</link>
      <description>Transfers of Cenvat-creditable inputs to sister units may be discharged by reversing the credit originally taken where no independent sale price to unrelated buyers exists, rather than by adopting a higher transaction value. Bona fide doubt created by changing rules and Board clarifications, combined with revenue neutrality where duty paid by one unit is creditable to the other, does not establish wilful suppression or intent to evade duty; extended limitation, penalty and related interest therefore do not apply. Credit on supplementary invoices remains admissible where corresponding duty is creditable, and differential freight demands cannot survive on the same revenue-neutral basis. Trimming charges were treated as non-includible in value on the stated facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>