<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 563 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427618</link>
    <description>Issue estoppel does not operate as an absolute bar to a renewed bail application, but repetitive grounds without fresh circumstances may still be rejected. Non-arrest during investigation and alleged irregularity in the warrant-and-custody process do not by themselves justify bail where the record shows non-cooperation, false addresses, inability to trace the accused, and issuance of warrants after absconding. Bail under the money-laundering statute also depends on satisfaction of the twin conditions; grave allegations of layered proceeds of crime, traceability of funds, and a real risk of interference or flight can defeat release. Continuing or further investigation does not dilute that statutory threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:21:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 563 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427618</link>
      <description>Issue estoppel does not operate as an absolute bar to a renewed bail application, but repetitive grounds without fresh circumstances may still be rejected. Non-arrest during investigation and alleged irregularity in the warrant-and-custody process do not by themselves justify bail where the record shows non-cooperation, false addresses, inability to trace the accused, and issuance of warrants after absconding. Bail under the money-laundering statute also depends on satisfaction of the twin conditions; grave allegations of layered proceeds of crime, traceability of funds, and a real risk of interference or flight can defeat release. Continuing or further investigation does not dilute that statutory threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>