https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304205 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the criminal appeal, affirming the lower court's judgment of acquittal due to improper service of notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the impermissible filing of the complaint by a General Power of Attorney holder. The court emphasized the necessity of proper service of notice and clarified that complaints under Section 138 must be filed by the payee or holder in due course, not by a power of attorney holder. As the notice was sent to the wrong address and the complaint was filed by a General Power of Attorney holder, the appeal was dismissed. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:37:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304205 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the criminal appeal, affirming the lower court's judgment of acquittal due to improper service of notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the impermissible filing of the complaint by a General Power of Attorney holder. The court emphasized the necessity of proper service of notice and clarified that complaints under Section 138 must be filed by the payee or holder in due course, not by a power of attorney holder. As the notice was sent to the wrong address and the complaint was filed by a General Power of Attorney holder, the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304205