<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30402</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the CESTAT&#039;s decision was dismissed. The Tribunal determined that the customs department&#039;s satisfaction regarding export obligations is conclusive, and the transferee of Value Based Advance Licenses (VABAL) is not required to prove the original license holder&#039;s compliance with notification conditions. The show cause notice lacked reference to any infractions by the original license holder, rendering the CESTAT&#039;s judgment valid and free from error.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30402</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the CESTAT&#039;s decision was dismissed. The Tribunal determined that the customs department&#039;s satisfaction regarding export obligations is conclusive, and the transferee of Value Based Advance Licenses (VABAL) is not required to prove the original license holder&#039;s compliance with notification conditions. The show cause notice lacked reference to any infractions by the original license holder, rendering the CESTAT&#039;s judgment valid and free from error.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>