<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1576 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304202</link>
    <description>An unprobated Will cannot be used to prove cancellation of an earlier Will or to defeat a claim for letters of administration based on that earlier Will, because Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act bars establishment of testamentary rights without probate or letters of administration. The bar applies even where the Will is relied on by a defendant, and only a truly collateral use of an unprobated Will is permitted. Where the later Will is asserted to have operative testamentary effect by cancelling the earlier instrument, its due execution and contents must first be proved in probate proceedings. The appeal therefore succeeded in part on admissibility, while the remaining directions were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 12:18:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1576 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304202</link>
      <description>An unprobated Will cannot be used to prove cancellation of an earlier Will or to defeat a claim for letters of administration based on that earlier Will, because Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act bars establishment of testamentary rights without probate or letters of administration. The bar applies even where the Will is relied on by a defendant, and only a truly collateral use of an unprobated Will is permitted. Where the later Will is asserted to have operative testamentary effect by cancelling the earlier instrument, its due execution and contents must first be proved in probate proceedings. The appeal therefore succeeded in part on admissibility, while the remaining directions were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>