<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 540 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427595</link>
    <description>An application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found maintainable where the Corporate Debtor had admitted liability and default in its reply and settlement correspondence, and where acknowledgments in financial statements supported a subsisting debt within limitation. On that basis, the petition was admitted and corporate insolvency resolution process was ordered, with appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional. The Bench also stated that it had no power to direct the Financial Creditor to accept the Corporate Debtor&#039;s one-time settlement proposal, so that request was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 06:47:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 540 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427595</link>
      <description>An application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found maintainable where the Corporate Debtor had admitted liability and default in its reply and settlement correspondence, and where acknowledgments in financial statements supported a subsisting debt within limitation. On that basis, the petition was admitted and corporate insolvency resolution process was ordered, with appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional. The Bench also stated that it had no power to direct the Financial Creditor to accept the Corporate Debtor&#039;s one-time settlement proposal, so that request was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>