<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 538 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427593</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the insolvency petition filed by the Operational Creditors, citing pre-existing disputes and the existence of parallel civil proceedings. The Operational Creditors were advised to pursue their remedies under other laws. The Tribunal emphasized that the purpose of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is not to adjudicate on disputed claims but to resolve genuine insolvency issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 06:47:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 538 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427593</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the insolvency petition filed by the Operational Creditors, citing pre-existing disputes and the existence of parallel civil proceedings. The Operational Creditors were advised to pursue their remedies under other laws. The Tribunal emphasized that the purpose of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is not to adjudicate on disputed claims but to resolve genuine insolvency issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>