<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 171 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30398</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit a specific amount within a specified timeframe and report compliance. The recovery of the remaining amounts was stayed pending the appeal&#039;s disposal, subject to the pre-deposit compliance. The decision emphasized the importance of the specific period covered by the definition change in determining the applicability of the &quot;tour operator&quot; definition to the services provided by the applicant. Further detailed examination was deemed necessary for the subsequent period, to be conducted during the final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 171 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30398</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit a specific amount within a specified timeframe and report compliance. The recovery of the remaining amounts was stayed pending the appeal&#039;s disposal, subject to the pre-deposit compliance. The decision emphasized the importance of the specific period covered by the definition change in determining the applicability of the &quot;tour operator&quot; definition to the services provided by the applicant. Further detailed examination was deemed necessary for the subsequent period, to be conducted during the final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>