<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 535 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427590</link>
    <description>Construction, erection and related works executed for a Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti were treated as exempt from service tax under the governmental authority notification. The Mandi Samiti, constituted under State law to regulate agricultural produce markets and perform public regulatory functions, was regarded as a governmental authority. The exemption remained available because the works were for market infrastructure and allied facilities used predominantly for regulatory purposes, not commerce or business. Incidental leasing or renting of shops and sheds in the market area did not alter the character of the activity or disqualify the exemption. The service tax demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 06:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 535 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427590</link>
      <description>Construction, erection and related works executed for a Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti were treated as exempt from service tax under the governmental authority notification. The Mandi Samiti, constituted under State law to regulate agricultural produce markets and perform public regulatory functions, was regarded as a governmental authority. The exemption remained available because the works were for market infrastructure and allied facilities used predominantly for regulatory purposes, not commerce or business. Incidental leasing or renting of shops and sheds in the market area did not alter the character of the activity or disqualify the exemption. The service tax demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>