<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 529 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427584</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the legality of the order issuing a warrant of arrest against the accused persons, including the petitioner, in a case involving illegal fund mobilization through Non-Convertible Debentures. Despite the petitioner&#039;s challenge citing a Supreme Court decision, the Court differentiated between offence categories and guidelines for issuing summons and warrants. Emphasizing compliance with regulatory provisions on public securities issues, the Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s revision for lacking merit, affirming the initial warrant&#039;s validity and legality. The judgment underscores the significance of regulatory compliance and provides a detailed analysis of the case&#039;s legal aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 529 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427584</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the legality of the order issuing a warrant of arrest against the accused persons, including the petitioner, in a case involving illegal fund mobilization through Non-Convertible Debentures. Despite the petitioner&#039;s challenge citing a Supreme Court decision, the Court differentiated between offence categories and guidelines for issuing summons and warrants. Emphasizing compliance with regulatory provisions on public securities issues, the Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s revision for lacking merit, affirming the initial warrant&#039;s validity and legality. The judgment underscores the significance of regulatory compliance and provides a detailed analysis of the case&#039;s legal aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>