<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 515 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427570</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the rectification order under Section 154 and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, allowing the additional grounds raised by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the determination of Fair Market Value (FMV) as of 01.04.1981 was debatable and not a clear mistake, thus partially allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the computation of indexed cost of acquisition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 515 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427570</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the rectification order under Section 154 and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, allowing the additional grounds raised by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the determination of Fair Market Value (FMV) as of 01.04.1981 was debatable and not a clear mistake, thus partially allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the computation of indexed cost of acquisition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>