<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 505 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427560</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the disallowance of the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against income from other sources, citing a violation of Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT emphasized the legislative intent behind the amendment and a CBDT Circular, directing the AO to allow the set-off as permissible until the assessment year 2016-17. The decision was pronounced on 9th September 2022, ordering the AO to permit the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:17:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=690433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 505 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427560</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the disallowance of the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against income from other sources, citing a violation of Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT emphasized the legislative intent behind the amendment and a CBDT Circular, directing the AO to allow the set-off as permissible until the assessment year 2016-17. The decision was pronounced on 9th September 2022, ordering the AO to permit the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>