<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 305 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30385</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the admissibility of the refund claims on merits but required a re-examination of the passing on of the duty burden to customers before finalizing the refund process. The legal principles governing refund of duty were meticulously analyzed, and the decision was based on a thorough assessment of the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 305 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30385</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the admissibility of the refund claims on merits but required a re-examination of the passing on of the duty burden to customers before finalizing the refund process. The legal principles governing refund of duty were meticulously analyzed, and the decision was based on a thorough assessment of the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>