https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304173 Delay and laches in challenging an appellate order were rejected where the record did not show service of the dismissal order and the petitioner had in fact furnished the required bank guarantee before the order was passed. The appellate authority had dismissed the appeal on the mistaken footing that no guarantee had been given, making the order erroneous. On those facts, the challenge was treated as timely, the appellate order dated 13.10.1997 was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner. en-us Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:15:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304173 Delay and laches in challenging an appellate order were rejected where the record did not show service of the dismissal order and the petitioner had in fact furnished the required bank guarantee before the order was passed. The appellate authority had dismissed the appeal on the mistaken footing that no guarantee had been given, making the order erroneous. On those facts, the challenge was treated as timely, the appellate order dated 13.10.1997 was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304173