<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 241 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30384</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the duty demand and penalty imposed under the Customs Act, 1962. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision was overturned as the Appellant was found to have complied with the DEPB Scheme and maintained proper records as per Customs Rules. The Tribunal determined that there was no evidence of diversion of imported material and that the Appellant&#039;s utilization of the imported material was in accordance with the rules, ultimately allowing the appeal on 25-2-2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 241 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30384</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the duty demand and penalty imposed under the Customs Act, 1962. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision was overturned as the Appellant was found to have complied with the DEPB Scheme and maintained proper records as per Customs Rules. The Tribunal determined that there was no evidence of diversion of imported material and that the Appellant&#039;s utilization of the imported material was in accordance with the rules, ultimately allowing the appeal on 25-2-2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>