<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 240 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the recovery under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the imposed penalty. The decision was based on the appellants&#039; regular duty payments and proper accounting, aligning with the precedent established in the Inductotherm (India) Pvt. Ltd. case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 240 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the recovery under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the imposed penalty. The decision was based on the appellants&#039; regular duty payments and proper accounting, aligning with the precedent established in the Inductotherm (India) Pvt. Ltd. case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>