<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 304 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30378</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants&#039; refund claim for coal ash duty paid under protest, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The Tribunal found that the duty incidence had not been passed on to customers based on the account books, making the appellants eligible for the refund. Emphasizing that profit margin alone cannot justify rejecting refund claims, the Tribunal reinstated the adjudication order, granting the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 304 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30378</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants&#039; refund claim for coal ash duty paid under protest, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The Tribunal found that the duty incidence had not been passed on to customers based on the account books, making the appellants eligible for the refund. Emphasizing that profit margin alone cannot justify rejecting refund claims, the Tribunal reinstated the adjudication order, granting the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>